|
soul^keeper |
  |
Administrateur
Déconnecté
Niveau : 5
N° de Membre :
1
Ancienneté : 100%
Participation : 19%
Inscription: 22 Feb 2002
Localisation: La Défense
Age: 48
Messages: 16623
Sujets Lancés : 2412
|
 A LIRE ABSOLUMENT !! Texte hyper intéressant !!
Rhôooooo lisez ça absolument !
En voilà une théorie qu'elle est intéressante et qui apporte de nouveaux éléments  ....
http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/03/03/17.html
Citation:
<big><b>Endgame</b></big>
It's the endgame of a mad, politically calculated war. From the beginning, everyone's agreed that Saddam Hussein is a bad man, almost a prototype for a villain in a James Bond Film.
But that's where the agreement stopped. The Bush Cartel, for a variety of politically and financially calculated reasons, decided that a war that could cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars was of strategic importance to its world domination game plan -- and to a second term for George W. Bush.
The corporate media -- for reasons of financial interest combined with sheer ineptitude -- enabled and facilitated a rush to war that was transparently self-serving for the Chickenhawks in the White House. The Democrats, as usual, allowed the Grand Hypocrisy Party (GHP) to define the issue in such a way that it marginalized any dissent. This despite the fact that the Bush Cartel brazenly used lies and shifting justifications to mask the real reasons for the war.
In the end, Bush is going to war for two reasons. First of all, the Iraq war offers him and his Vietnam service evading administration many political positives from their perspective, including (but not limited to):
<b>1. The permanent war public relations strategy is, in large part, aimed at keeping any of the numerous Bush domestic disasters off of the political table. War supersedes even an economy down the tubes. </b> *1*
<b>2. Keeping the threat of terror simmering on the burner through ginned up and meaningless terror alerts scares Americans into supporting Bush, because they seemingly have no option, since they believe they are under a constant terrorist threat. This leads to a sort of "Stockholm Syndrome" for the nation as a whole. Most Americans look to their psychological tormentor for protection from an outside threat perceived as the more serious of two evils. </b> *2*
<b>3. A war in Iraq offers almost bottomless billion-dollar profiteering opportunities for Bush Cartel campaign contributors and Bush administration officials. Halliburton, the Carlyle Group, etc. are all set to reap big financial benefits from the destruction of the Iraq infrastructure. Blow the country up with bombs paid for by taxpayers -- and then use taxpayer dollars to pay campaign contributors and companies with connections to administration officials to rebuild it. A nice scam if you got a railroad car on the gravy train. </b> *3*
<b>4. By using a brutal, thuggish "diplomacy" -- including threats, bribes and intimidation -- the Bush Cartel has alienated the populations of almost every nation in the world. It has managed to lure a few "leaders" into the alliance of the unwilling with a combination of inducements worthy of a crime family, but created a hostile reaction in almost every country. Why does the seemingly disastrous result actually benefit the Bush Cartel? Because they want to see the United Nations sink into the East River. They don't want anybody but the Bush Cartel Chickenhawks calling the international shots. Sayonara, U.N., and good riddance. That's what the Bush administration fanatics want -- and they are on the verge of achieving their goal. </b> *4*
<b>5. Through the financial "inducements" the Bush administration has offered some nations to support the war, they have found an ingenious way to pay back campaign contributors. Take Poland, for instance. The Bush administration gives Poland six billion dollars in taxpayer money (which would be okay if it were for improving the lot of Polish citizens). What will Poland use the money for, according to a New York Times article? Why, to buy six billion dollars worth of fighter jets from Lockheed-Martin. </b> *5*
<b>6. The assertion of raw, brute, power -- in the form of sophisticated killing war technology -- is meant to intimidate all of the nations of the world, not just our enemies. It is also meant to bully dissenters at home into submission. Since Democratic leaders usually cower when the Bush Cartel barks, it is, additionally, meant to scare them into "dazed and confused" passivity. </b> *6*
<b>7. The conquest of Iraq will shore up a Middle East alliance with the Sharon government, with whom the Bush Cartel shares a common worldview. (The Sharon right wing government is, in this case, to be viewed as a distinct political entity. It is clear that Bush would not have cared a hoot about Israel if the Labor government were in power. Remember that the right wing in Israel killed Yitzhak Rabin, a man of peace. Sharon and Bush are two peas in a pod for whom war is peace.) </b> *7*
<b>8. An attack on Iraq will almost surely be the catalyst for renewed terrorist attacks. After the next terrorist attack, the Bush Cartel will further dismantle the Constitution and move toward a Stalinist "KGB police powers" state of emergency with the likely passage of "Patriot II". It is the Bush Cartel's goal to incrementally seize power until it one day, unnoticed, crosses the line into a dictatorship rather than a democracy. (If you think this is some fringe conspiracy theory, think about the theft of election 2000, think about the 6 year attempt to find a way to impeach Bill Clinton. This is a clique that thinks God has chosen it to run America.) </b> *8*
<b>9. A permanent war will pave the way for even larger Republican majorities in Congress. This will further consolidate a government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich. It will also mean an accelerated dismantling of government services and the removal of any separation between church and state. </b> *9*
<b>10. The media will be even more in the pocket of the Bush Cartel, because war has become a form of media news entertainment. War increases print readership and television news viewership. War is "exciting." War is profitable for the news media. </b> *10*
<b>11. The war will increase oil prices and give the second largest oil reserves to American and British oil companies, who financially support the Republican Party. </b> *11*
<b>12. A permanent war will ensure that no one digs up the truth about the Bush administration's catastrophic failure to prevent 9/11, including an August 2001 briefing that warned Bush about terrorist hijackings. Bush did nothing in response to that briefing. </b> *12*
<b>13. The religious right and Neo-Confederacy warrior culture will be energized to contribute more to the 2004 Bush election effort, as well as turn out at the polls. </b> *13*
<b>14. There is nothing like a war to try out the latest mega-bombs and hi tech weapons. It's hard to find a place to target practice nowadays, let alone a whole country with real live people in it -- alive for the moment, anyway. And, of course, when bombs are blown up, more bombs are needed. They just happen to be manufactured by companies that contribute to the Bush Cartel election fund. And when more taxpayer money goes toward bombs and new military equipment, there is even less money for government services. Ah, yes, the perfect war for the extremist right wingers running our nation. </b> *14*
But what is the number one reason that the Bush Cartel will send our sons and daughters into War?
The number one reason is that it has no Plan "B."
As BuzzFlash noted in an earlier editorial entitled "Muscle Beach Party":
In the end the Bush Cartel is banking on making the kind of impression on the world that a thug makes with a baseball bat on a car.
<b>It's all about image and firepower. It's how the playground bully establishes himself. Pick the weakest guy in the school -- the one nobody likes much anyway -- and beat the living daylights out of him. Keep all the kids nervous and on edge. Let them think that you are a little bit mad and might just beat up on them for the fun of it. Tell them that you will protect them from the gang that lives in the next neighborhood in return for their loyalty. Make an example of anyone who challenges your leadership by denouncing them and bloodying them up. Establish a system of stool pigeons. Rummage through lockers, at your will, for any signs of betrayal. Issue warnings from time-to-time about how you have information that the other gang has plans to rape your mothers and sisters, and lay waste to your homes -- and that is why you need to trust in the playground bully from your school, because he will protect your mothers and sisters from the gang that few have ever actually encountered. </b> *15*
It's governance by brazen muscle power, by unfailing commitment to picking a target to destroy as an example of your ruthlessness, and your will to use any means necessary to establish and preserve your leadership. And if your attack is successful, you will enjoy the spoils of war -- the second largest oil reserves in the world. This is all the better, because you double up your goal of displaying raw, harsh military power, by combining it with additional natural resources that reinforce your dominance. You will be sitting on top of the world, masters of the universe, controlling almost everything on the Monopoly board.
And to accomplish this goal, you never blink, you never apologize, you never let facts get in the way of your mission. You remain steadfast and focused. Getting distracted by truth and ethics is a sign of weakness. And weakness is something you can smell and feel in a man.
(See: http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/03/01/23.html)
In a just-published book about Karl Rove, "Bush's Brain," a Democratic political consultant is quoted as saying about the Bush Cartel: "They just picked a war they could win....It has to be the most evil political calculation in American history."
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL |
*1* : bon ça on l'avait déjà vu: Bush a tellement merdé au niveau économie LOCALE que focaliser les attentions sur la guerre est un bon moyen de faire oublier le reste.
*2* : ça ça s'appelle de la désinformation... on fait croire qu'on est menacé d'attaques terroriste, comme ça on légitime la guerre on prétextant que c'est une action anti-terroriste... Evidemment les américains n'y voient que du feu pour la plupart...
*3* : Eh oui, ingénieux non ? On détruit tout, et après on fait payer pour reconstruire....
*4* : J'appelle ça "diviser pour mieux régner" ... ça permet du même coup (même si c'est pas explicitement montré ici) de tenter non seulement de discréditer l'ONU, <u>mais aussi l'Europe !</u>
*5* : Un petit peu de corruption.... on achète (ou tout au moins on essaie, car ça marche pas toujours) les pays réticents à la guerre...
*6* : "Je me la pète avec mon armée" .. alors "faites gaffes à vos fesses hein, vous savez ce que je vaux" ...
*7* : Et ouais, comme disais arka: "à qui profite le crime ?" .. bah là on en voit un exemple...
*8* : ça c'est immonde... mais loin d'être tiré par les cheveux. On sait tous Bush capable de ça : il "espère" secrètement qu'il va y avoir d'autres attaques terroristes sur le continent américain pour conforter la désinformation évoquée au point *2* et continuer de légitimer (sans retenue) la poursuite de la conquête du monde "pour balayer le terrorisme".... Quand je disais plus haut qu'il s'attaquerait sûrement à l'Iran ensuite, toujours en prétextant la guerre contre l'axe du mal.... Sauf qu'en passant on s'approprie le pétrole pour être encore plus dominant (2ème effet Kiss Kool).
*9* : On oeuvre pour ses intérêts personnels (carrière politique) bien qu'on fait croire qu'on oeuvre dans l'intérêt du peuple... Habile... Evidemment comme on fait la guerre, on justifie qu'on a plus les moyens de financer des services... hop... on économise sur le dos du peuple pour s'en mettre encore plus plein les fouilles... Dernier point : On refout autant qu'on peu la religion au coeur de la société, histoire de faire un peu comme Saddam.... Coïncidence ? Ben non, tous les dictateurs agissent pareil, on l'a dit plus tôt: la religion est l'arme par excellence pour coller des oeillères aux peuple !
*10* : En même temps on fait tourner l'économie locale car la demande de news afflut et évidemment ça plaît aux médias (vont il ensuite remercier Bush à leur manière en le plébiscitant lors des prochaines élection ?... A voir... peut etre moyennant des $$$ .... Business is Business n'est ce pas ?)
*11* : On s'en met encore plein les fouilles avec le Pétrole...
*12* : Voir *1* : On continue la guerre aussi longtemps qu'il faut pour enterrer les déboires de la politique intérieure...
*13* : Pas de commentaire là dessus. Moi et la religion de toute façon ça fait 2.
*14* : Ben ouais !! Quoi de mieux qu'un terrain d'essai "réel" pour tester ses bombes, c'est bien vrai ça !! 
*15* : Alors ça c'est trop bien vu lololol... L'analogie est EXCELLENTE, vous trouvez pas ? Le pire c'est que tout est dans le bluff, comme indiqué, et ça marche !! "he will protect your mothers and sisters from the gang <b>that few have ever actually encountered</b>" .. C'est bel et bien le cas : l'Amérique a peur d'un ennemi qu'elle n'a jamais vu à l'oeuvre dans son territoire !!!!!!
Citation:
Message provenant de Cybernet
le 3ème point n'était pas sur celui que comptait le plus les Irakiens c'est clair, néanmoins, ça fait quand me^me quelque chose de bombarder une ville sachant que des êtes humains vivent en bas. Bien sûr les marines US sont lobotomisés pour killer du saddam mais certains vont peut être gamberger
C'est un peu comme le mec de cité avec son gun, il prétends qu'il va tuer qui il veut, mais arrivé au moment décisif, d'appuyer sur la gâchette posée sur la tempe de quelqu'un, ça fait réfléchir et une bonne partie n'appuieront pas finalement. |
A une différence près, c'est que le "mec de cité avec son gun", il réfléchit aux CONSEQUENCES de ses actes (prison....) c'est ça qui le fait hésiter.
Alors que le bidasse, lui, il s'en tape, il est couvert par le gouvernement, il peut tuer impunément, commêtre les pires crimes, il ne craint rien : c'est BUSH qui est responsable... Donc aucune raison d'hésiter, surtout qu'au contraire, si tu désertes, tu risques la prison !
Citation:
Message provenant de Cybernet
Sinon pour en revenir au débat, j'ai la forte conviction que les Etats Unis ont fait une énorme erreur avec cette guerre, que les évenements vont les rattraper, et que plus rien ne sera comme avant.
Les USA vont subir des représailles à plusieurs niveaux (terroristes, économiques, etc ...) et leur puissance mondiale va s'éfriter au fil des prochaines années........... |
A moins que ce ne soit au fil des prochains <b>mois</b> ....
Signaler ce message à un modérateur | IP: Logguée
Temps en ligne : 92 Jours, 20 Heures, 31 Minutes, 0 Seconde en ligne
|
22-03-2003 11:34
.
Genius.... 
eoples</S> <I>folk</I> to throw off this cultural <S>imperialism</S> <I>lording-it-over-others</I> and <S>declare</S> <I>say</I> our linguistic freedom. It is time to <S>
